Lack of Updates on this blog



It has been more than a year since I posted anything on this blog.

Previously, I was posting my investment performance everymonth.

Nowadays (since around March last year), I don’t monitor my investment performance every day. Previously, I used to purchase (mostly) or sell stock everyday. However, since the last year, this trading frequency has come down considerably. One, because I reached my target of how much money I wanted to invest in stocks as a percentage of my overall portfolio. Second, because I could not find the kind of bargains I wanted. In the last two months, some of the bargains did appear (and because my portfolio shrunk, I again have room to invest in stocks withing my overall asset allocation plan). Alas, I was short of cash because of a variety of investment needs and taxes, so I could not do so.

However, I do monitor my investment performance on a quarterly basis. At the beginning of April, I shall post my portfolio performance, along with my choice of stocks.

Another reason that I don’t monitor my investment portfolio that much is that I am reasonably satisfied with it. It contains a set of diversified stocks (diversified on the basis on industry, size, short term and long term prospects, dividend yield), which I don’t wish to tweak very much.

So I will keep posting portfolio updates every quarter. However, this blog shall now be a lot more about my trading systems performance.

More on this later!!

No more monthly updates on investment performance



After long thought, I have decided to stop monthly updates on my investment performance, at least for a while.

There are many reasons for the same. Certainly one of the practical reasons is that I was spending way too much time on updating and refining my spreadsheets, neglecting more essential things. The other was that I was almost reviewing my performance on a minute to minute basis, and I think that that kind of obsessiveness results in too much activity on the stock markets. It is better not to know every minute what your performance is. The third reason is more nuanced. If indeed, I am a long term investor, why am I worried whether I have beaten the benchmarks daily, weekly, monthly or trimonthly. I should take a view on a stock at a particular price. If the price falls, I should buy more. Then I just need to review the performance every year, and try to beat the benchmarks every year. This is because my one and a half year’s intense experience has taught me that a) Markets often get it wrong in the short run and b) that momentum traders sometimes trade up a stock excessively, or sometimes punish a stock unreasonably. Momentum trading may be profitable for the people who practice it, but I cannot see myself trading solely on price, without any fundamental backing.

If markets do get it wrong in the short run, then why worry about performance in the short run. I should only worry about performance in the long run. And this is what I intend to achieve by not keeping on comparing myself to benchmarks.

Investment Performance from November 2013 to February 2014

How has been my investment performance? Every month, on the day after expiry, I will post my current investment performance in the form of this graph.

Just a brief explanation of the above.

I started monitoring my portfolio rigidly from November 8, 2013. On that day, I also started monitoring the performance of the Nifty, a top ranking Midcap Fund, and a top ranking diversified fund. Look towards the bottom of this post to find a summary of my performance.

What I did was the following:

a) Creating a Normalized Assets under Management

I took my total portfolio, on the starting date, and normalized it to a starting position of a 1000, by choosing an arbitrary divider. (For example, if my total portfolio was Rs. 21000, then my divider was 21). This represents my total assets under management (AUM), normalized. On every day, the total portfolio is divided by the same arbitrary divider to get the normalized AUM. (For example, if the portfolio would grow to Rs. 42000, then the normalized AUM would become (42000/21) 2000.

b) Calculating an initial NAV

I assumed an NAV of Rs. 1000 on the starting date, and divided the total portfolio value to get the number of units on the starting date. Sticking to our prior example, for a total portfolio size of Rs. 21000, the number of units would be 21.

c) Accounting for buying and selling

On each day I did some selling or buying of stocks, I calculated the net purchase or sale. This figure would be +ve for net purchases, or -ve for net sales. I then divided this by the previous day’s NAV to find out the net change in the units. For example, if on November 9, 2013, I bought a 1000 Rs. worth of stock, then the number of units would increase from 21 to 22. If I sold a net of Rs.2000 worth of stock, then the number of units would decrease by 2 to 19.

d) Finding the daily NAV

On each day, I used Moneycontrol to give me my portfolio value, after accounting for buying and selling. This portfolio value was divided by the number of units, to arrive at that day’s NAV. For example, if on November 9, 2013, I had purchased a 1000 Rs. worth of stock, which would have increased the number of units to 22, and the total portfolio value at EoD of November 9, 2013 was 23000, then my NAV would be Rs. 23000/22, or Rs. 1045.

e) Accounting for Dividends

Actually, when I note that I used Moneycontrol to arrive at my total portfolio value, this is not entirely true. My total portfolio value on any day has been accounted for by adding the total portfolio value of my stocks and the total amount of dividends received by me after November 8, 2013. This means that dividends flow directly to increase the NAV, and not the number of units.

This makes sense to me. Presumably, everytime a dividend is received, the price of the stock goes down by that extent, meaning that the portfolio value of stocks is decreased to that extent. This would result in a false reduction of the NAV, which gets accounted for by the way I have handled dividends above.

6) Normalizing the values for the Nifty, and two funds- SBI Midcap Fund, and Kotak Classic Fund.
On November 8, 2013, I normalized the value of the NIFTY to 1000, and also the NAV of the two funds to a starting point of 1000.

Why did I normalize? So that it is easier to visualize these values in a graph like the one above. If each of the starting values are a 1000, then it is easy to compare performances. And I don’t end up revealing the total assets under my management. I think that my performance should be measured without reference to the actual amount of money made/lost. A young person without lots of savings might find my portfolio impressive, merely because of its size. Others may find it insignificant. Does not really matter, as what matters is the percentage return.

Summary of Performance from November to February

From November 8, 2013, to Feb 26, 2014 (approximately 3.5 months), my NAV increased from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 1114, a percentage increase of 11.4%, or an annualized increase of 39%. The Nifty in the meantime rose by 1.6%, while the Midcap Nifty and Small Cap Nifty (not presented in the graph above), rose by 1.4% and 7% respectively.

Seems impressive. Not so fast. Had I instead invested all my money in the SBI Magnum Midcap Fund, I would have returned 17% during the same period. Great performance by this fund. The Kotak Classic fund, which is more invested in front line stocks, did much worse, increasing by only 3.3% during this time.

I am still learning. I hope in a few months, that I can start beating all the funds. In the future, every month, along with the graph above, I shall also give a table of rolling returns.